What Judges Want
Judges are people. They make decisions everyday about the future of other people, and they rely on the information to hand together with submissions from the defence barrister to make a decision that could affect the defendant’s future. And judges are well aware that a prison sentence can have a negative effect from loss of employment, loss of housing and even loss of family, not to mention the struggles of reintegration into society. So they don’t take this decision likely and, in most cases, look for reasons to try and give a different, lesser sentence. But they need information to be able to make a positive difference, and that is where Mitigation.org.uk comes in. We understand what is more likely to work and what nearly always won’t. Just look at our case study here to see the impact that good mitigation can have and then consider calling.
What Judges Say*
Using Excuses
" Parroting on the same old rubbish including the sick cat - it is not going to work now and at any time."
Poor Quality
"Pleas are too long, filled with irrelevant material, and poorly structured. They waste time.
No Originality
Mitigation as a scatter-gun approach, repeated with no thought in case after case”
* all these statements were uttered by a Judge or Recorder - see Mitigation: The role of personal factors in sentencing - J Jacobsen, M Hough 2011
How can it go so wrong?
​
-
Low levels of Legal aid
-
Barristers who are busy and don't know you
-
Not knowing what makes a difference
-
Not knowing what doesn't make a difference
-
Poor or no mitigation
-
Not spending enough time om mitigation
-
Assuming that judges are not clever
-
Judges are very busy and don't have time
-
Not understanding how serious everything is
-
And 101 other issues.